|
Working Alone Legislation: Amendment to the Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Act | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An amendment to the Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Regulations (AR448/83) comes into full force on April 30, 2001. This amendment is designed to ensure that adequate measures are taken to protect workers who are working alone. It requires employers to achieve this by:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Occupational Health and Safety Act is intended to set standards to protect the health and safety of employees in Alberta. Employers have responsibilities are expected to set up safe work practices and also to ensure that these practices are followed. Workers are also expected to cooperate and follow the rules designed to promote health and safety at the workplace. This is the act that requires WHMIS training for workers to inform them of all the hazards they may encounter while doing their job. The amendment was developed, at least partly, as a result of the death of a convenience-store worker after a robbery in Calgary. However, it has application for many different kinds of job situations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Definitions and Interpretations: back to top A worker is considered as “working alone” if the individual is working by his/herself such that assistance is not readily available should some injury, illness or emergency arise. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exemptions: back to top
The Act does not apply to: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What needs to be done if people you supervise are working alone: back to top
You should also consider an assessment of work in areas like offices or reading rooms where no "hazardous activities" are conducted. In these instances, matters of personal security are likely most important. You could advise someone that you expect to return be a certain time so that they might check on you if you are late. This would be much more important if a person had a medical condition that predisposed them to become incapacitated (e.g. epilepsy). Workers and supervisors need to assess the risk of injury for the individuals in all areas, even those where activity risks are considered minimal. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. Hazard Assessment back to top
This might include restricting certain activities until another person is present. This is exactly the same as prohibiting certain activities if workers are not properly trained or if they do not have the appropriate safety equipment (a fume-hood for distilling benzene or a safety harness and rope if you are climbing 30 meters up a tree). Some examples of activities that could result in severe personal injury and which should not be attempted without a backup could include things like: distilling phenol, entering into a confined space or one where the atmosphere might be dangerous (a deep metal tank where rusting can deplete the oxygen level), getting close to an animal carcass that has recently been killed (whatever killed it may be close by). Any such activities should be explicitly mentioned in your hazard assessment. It is up to the supervisor in consultation with the workers to identify such situations. The standard that will be applied if a “problem” arises will be by comparing your hazard assessment to others of a similar nature. If other people have identified five hazards in a situation very similar to yours and have taken measures to avoid them while you have not, you will probably be found lacking in discharging your responsibility to help protect workers and could be charged under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Besides injury from personal actions, consider hazards that might arise from other aspects of the work. Are you exposed to personal attack by animals (bears, dogs, elk) including humans? Do you have to travel to remote locations and meet with clients you do not know in their office? You might control risk of personal injury for indoor work by requiring doors be kept shut and locked if you are alone. You might suggest (or require) workers use the services of the Safe Walk program if they are leaving the campus after dark. Adding a check-in and check-out routine may be warranted to know if someone is overdue whether in travel to a worksite or leaving an office to return home. Further information on preparing a hazard assessment is here and there are some examples of field hazards. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. Effective Communication: back to top In case someone needs help, they need access to a means of communication. This does not mean everyone must be issued a cellular phone or radio although these may be a good idea in some situations. Within the department there are telephones in many rooms and most of the pay phones have quick dial buttons to Campus security and 911. Undergraduate students should be made aware of where telephones are located and who to call (Campus Security knows their way around campus while a 911 operator will want your street address; call for help at the university first). If nothing else is available, a tripped fire alarm will bring assistance. Field workers present a bigger problem with regard to communication. Cell phones may not work where you are located and you may be out of radio contact. In this case, a check-out check-in system might be used. A log book is kept in a base camp and people sign out before they leave indicating route, destination, activity and estimated return time. When they return they check back in. The log must be examined at regular intervals and procedures should have been outlined in case a search has to be mounted. In some cases, a check in routine might be used even if an electronic means of communication is available. If someone is doing highly dangerous work like felling trees or crawling through sewers, they might have hourly contacts with someone. The frequency of contact will depend on the nature of the hazard. Even without electronic communication, regular contact could be achieved using flash lights or flags if for instance, people were working on opposite sides of a lake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Practical: back to top Look at a sample guideline that might be used for a teaching or research laboratory (a Word2000™ document that you can customize). The process of conducting a hazard assessment and seeking measures to reduce the risks will take some time. Except in simple situations, the assessment will need to be reviewed and updated as conditions change or after talking to colleagues doing similar work. It is hoped that everyone in our department will start now to develop these procedures and hopefully we can share ideas. Some examples to help you get started: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. A graduate student working in a chemical laboratory:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. An undergraduate student working in a chemical laboratory: Similar to the graduate student but consider the individuals may have much less experience and may not be familiar with the building or who to contact in an emergency. More activities may be restricted because of their inexperience.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3. Anyone working in an office on campus: Occupational injury would not normally be anticipated for this situation. However a person could still trip and become injured. The potential risk here is that they are alone and may be subject to personal attack. The door should be kept shut and locked at all times. If there is a glass door or window, consider working out of public view. Post the numbers for Campus Security or Safe Walk on campus. Have people check in and out with someone when they arrive and when they leave to go home. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4. Field research away form a remote base camp:
When you are trying to judge the likelihood and severity of a hazard, consider the factors that are uncontrolled variables: could there be a bear in the area? if you are climbing a tree, footing may be a problem even with appropriate equipment so that’s why you need a backup worker. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: back to top
All supervisors need to begin a hazard assessment of any situations where workers may have to work alone. You need to identify potential hazards and consider means to reduce or eliminate the risks. I suggest a point form approach to the assessment and the guidelines as long as everything can be made clear. Most of these assessments will include preparing a list of emergency contacts (telephone numbers), how to contact help, and locations of safety equipment and other resources. The assessment must be written and the information communicated to all workers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sources for further information: back to top
1. Working alone guidelines and sample templates from the University of Alberta Office of Environmental Health and Safety (look on their policiesweb page). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please contact me if you would like me to review your assessment. Tom Hantos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BGMcC April 06, 2001; rev Jun 01/09 |